Skip to main content
· 2/20/1991

United States v. David E. Lawson

Citations

  • 925 F.2d 1207
  • 91 Daily Journal DAR 2097
  • 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1227
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2617
  • 1991 WL 18548

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “when a party is allowed to commingle funds and merely is required to pay the amount of net auction proceeds to the seller, his status is more properly seen as a debtor rather than a bailee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Poole, Hall, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.