United States v. David Carlson, United States of America v. Carina Leveriza, A/K/A Carina Franz, A/K/A Karen, United States of America v. Walter Franz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding prohibition on the manufacturing of substances “substantially similar” to controlled substances was not vague as applied to drug manufacturers who “obviously had actual notice” because they moved their laboratory to avoid prosecution under the law
• rejecting vagueness challenge because the defendants’ conduct indicated they “had actual notice” of the prohibition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).