United States v. David Benitez-Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plain language of UNITED STATES v. ALMAZAN-BECERRA 3611 section 2L1.2 “includes as a qualifying offense possession with intent to distribute or dispense”
• holding that a Nevada statute “which provides that ‘it is unlawful for a person to possess for the purposes of sale’ . . . any controlled substance” categorically qualified as a drug trafficking offense
• holding that “there was error and UNITED STATES v. CASTILLO-MARIN 7809 the error was clear” when the district court incorrectly imposed a 16-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) on the basis that the defendant has committed an aggravated fel- ony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).