· 1/21/2000
United States v. David Aldaco
Citations
- 201 F.3d 979
- 53 Fed. R. Serv. 1154
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 767
- 2000 WL 46062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prejudice is minimized when the government makes clear to the jury that the replica is not the actual murder weapon possessed by the defendant
- applying the Fed.R.Evid. 403 balancing test to determine that the probative value of a replica shotgun outweighed the prejudice to a criminal defendant
- upholding the admissibility of a shotgun as demonstrative evidence and listing cases
- prejudice is minimized when government made clear to the jury that the replica was not the actual weapon possessed by the defendant
- the replica could not be used during deliberations and the court gave a proper cautionary instruction
- the replica could not be used during deliberations and the court gave a proper cautionary instruction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffey, Kanne, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.