United States v. Darwin McNeil Germaine Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that sentences imposed for violating 4 terms of supervised release are reviewed under “the same standard as for sentencing generally”
• concluding the supervised 4576 UNITED STATES v. HUERTA-PIMENTAL release revocation scheme “remains unaffected by Booker”
• stating that the 8 consequences of violating supervised release are “authorized by the original 9 conviction”
• noting that sentences imposed for violating 4 terms of supervised release are reviewed under “the same standard as for sentencing generally”
• “[A] violation of supervised release is not a separate basis for criminal punishment that requires a jury verdict and all that that entails.”
• “[A] sentence for violation of supervised release is [reviewed under] the same standard as for sentencing generally: whether the sentence imposed is reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).