United States v. Darvin James Redd, Darvin James Redd v. Jeffrey J. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims previously 24 raised on appeal “cannot be the basis of a § 2255 motion”
• holding that 27 claims previously raised on appeal “cannot be the basis of a § 2255 motion”
• holding that claims previously 1 raised on appeal “cannot be the basis of a § 2255 motion”
• holding that claims previously 1 raised on appeal “cannot be the basis of a § 2255 motion”
• failure to raise issues at probation hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).