Skip to main content
· 4/5/1988

United States v. Darryl W. Archer

Citations

  • 843 F.2d 1019
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5059
  • 1988 WL 32574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence where both the magistrate and the district court held separate hearings on defendant’s motion to exclude evidence under Rule 404(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.