Skip to main content
· 2/3/1995

United States v. Darryl Sykes

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 869
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2101
  • 1995 WL 39999

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a consideration of the amount of money involved in a fraud case was not double counting when the district court also referred to the deterrent effect of the sentence
  • under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(1), not necessary to state reasons; affirming where court, nonetheless, stated that sentence was imposed for purposes of punishment, general deterrence, and incapacitation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Godbold, Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.