United States v. Darryl \Monk\ Reynolds (84-5697), Sam Gilbert (84-5698)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the existence of arrest warrants was irrelevant to the custody analysis because the warrants were unknown to the defendants
• statements after warrant had been obtained not protected by the Sixth Amendment right to counsel as no judicial proceedings had taken place
• “Since the warrants were unknown to defendants, their existence could not have affected how the defendants understood their position, which is the only relevant consideration under Berkemer.”
• “Since the warrants were unknown to defendants, their existence could not have affected how the defendants understood their position, which is the only relevant consideration under Berkemer!’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).