United States v. Darryl Lee Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing district court’s sua sponte order of acquittal issued post-conviction because the provisions of Rule 29(c) “do not differ from those of Rule 33 in any respect sufficient to justify different treatment of these rules”
• “Rule 45(b) prohibits the court from extending the time for taking any action under Rule 29 and Rule 33 in a manner inconsistent with those rules.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).