United States v. Darryl Burton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district court denied motion for return of seized property because government asserted that it never had custody of property; reversed and remanded because district court did not receive evidence to determine who had custody or possession of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).