United States v. Darron J. Murphy, Sr., Cross-Appellee, and Jennifer Baker, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the government “waived waiver” by asserting the plain Nos. 08-2378, 08-3226 & 08-3238 13 error standard applied
• holding that the district court should reverse defendant’s conviction only if “the record contains no evidence on which a rational jury could have returned a guilty verdict”
• affirming conviction because defendant could not show he probably would have been acquitted if the jury instruction had been accurate
• affirming conviction because defendant could not show he probably would have been acquitted if the jury instruction had been accurate
• affirming conviction because defendant could not show he probably would have been acquitted if the jury instruction had been accurate
• noting that these are separate offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).