United States v. Darrell W. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that conditions of supervised release are “appropriately tailored ... so long as they are warranted by the defendant’s history and characteristics”
• explaining that a district court “must address the defendant’s principal arguments in mitigation unless they have no legal merit”
• explaining that a district court “must address the defendant’s principal arguments in mitigation unless they have no legal merit”
• explaining that a district court “must address the defendant’s principal arguments in mitigation unless they have no legal merit”
• stating that the district court \appropriately relied on probation's assessment of the danger [the defendant] posed and the needs of the community\
• “So long as the record gives us confidence that the court meaningfully considered the defendant’s mitigation arguments, ‘even if implicitly and imprecisely,’ that is enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).