United States v. Darnyl Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Courts are afforded considerable latitude in them decisions to replace appointed counsel, and may do so where a potential conflict of interest exists ... and in the interests of justice ... among other circumstances.” (internal citations and quotations omitted)
• “There is no constitutional right to continuity of appointed counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).