United States v. Darnell A. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant’s expression of impatience with the length of an automobile search, unaccompanied by a specific request to leave, did not constitute a withdrawal of consent to search
• stating that “[w]ithdrawal of consent need not be effectuated through particular ‘magic words’”
• finding protests about the length of time the search was taking without any specific request to leave did not under the circumstances amount to an unequivocal withdrawal of consent
• finding protests about the length of time the search was taking without any specific request to leave did not under the circumstances amount to an unequivocal withdrawal of consent
• finding protests about the length of time the search was taking without any specific request to leave did not under the circumstances amount to an unequivocal withdrawal of consent
• considering whether defendant withdrew his consent only after recognizing that consent was originally granted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).