United States v. Darnell A. Catlett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the same burden-of-proof instruction as that used here cured any confusion caused by a prosecutor's remark that the jury could have understood as burden- shifting
• holding that the same burden-of-proof instruction as that used here cured any confusion caused by a prosecutor's remark that the jury could have understood as burden- shifting
• holding that accurate jury instructions on the state’s burden of proof \would have cured any confusion caused by the prosecutor’s remarks\ sug- gesting incorrectly that the burden rested with the defendant
• indicating that referring to the absence of testimony from a defendant could be problematic
• no bar in this Circuit to \dual testimony as both a fact and expert witness\
• no bar in this Circuit to \dual testimony as both a fact and expert witness\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).