United States v. Darius Vaiseta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s “‘might have’ argument, without any evidence that his rights and interests were compromised by the declaration of a mistrial, cannot prevail against the specific facts and circumstances of this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).