United States v. Dario Arteaga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he outrageous-conduct defense requires not only government overinvolvement in the charged crime but a passive role by the defendant as well.”
• due process not violated by use of informant who formerly was defendant’s attorney on commercial matters
• no \general duty\ to tape record conversations in which defendant claims he was entrapped
• no “general duty” to tape record conversations in which defendant claims he was entrapped
• obligation to preserve recordings once made but no general duty to create recordings
• no \general duty\ to tape record conversations in which defendant claims he was entrapped

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).