United States v. Danny Nick Porter, United States of America v. Thomas Lynn Porter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal defendant is precluded from seeking \re- view of a sentencing court's discretion in setting a sentence anywhere within a properly calculated sentencing range\
• holding that criminal defendant is precluded from seeking \re- view of a sentencing court's discretion in setting a sentence anywhere within a proplery calculated sentencing range\
• holding that the court's imposition of a sentence within the properly calculated guideline range does not state an appealable question under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3742 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)
• noting this circuit’s adher- ence to the doctrine announced in Ker and Frisbie to reject criminal defendants’ challenge to their involuntary removal from the Philip- pines and return to the United States for trial
• in multiple-count sentences, to the extent possible without exceeding statutory maximum or minimums, the sentence on each count shall be equal to the total punishment
• in multiple-count sentences, to the extent possible without exceeding statutory maximum or minimums, the sentence on each count shall be equal to the total punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).