Skip to main content
· 7/1/2016

United States v. Danny Lewis

Citations

  • 827 F.3d 787
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12132
  • 2016 WL 3568112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating District Court's finding that Younger abstention operated as a dismissal with prejudice was “incorrect” and an “overly broad reading of our Younger abstention precedent”
  • stating District Court’s finding that Younger abstention operated as a dismissal with prejudice was “incorrect” and an “overly broad reading of our Younger abstention precedent”
  • applying the entire controversy doctrine as F2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Melloy, Colloton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.