· 7/1/2016
United States v. Danny Lewis
Citations
- 827 F.3d 787
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 12132
- 2016 WL 3568112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating District Court's finding that Younger abstention operated as a dismissal with prejudice was “incorrect” and an “overly broad reading of our Younger abstention precedent”
- stating District Court’s finding that Younger abstention operated as a dismissal with prejudice was “incorrect” and an “overly broad reading of our Younger abstention precedent”
- applying the entire controversy doctrine as F2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wollman, Melloy, Colloton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.