United States v. Danny Harmon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that any error in calculating a defendant’s criminal-history category “was harmless” because “his guidelines range was the same—360 months to life— whether he was in criminal history category I or II”
• concluding that any error in calculating a defendant’s criminal-history category “was harmless” because “his guidelines range was the same—360 months to life— whether he was in criminal history category I or II”
• finding harmless error when the guidelines range was the same, 360 months to life, whether defendant was in criminal history category I or II

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).