· 7/31/2006
United States v. Danny D. Fortner
Citations
- 455 F.3d 752
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 19149
- 2006 WL 2102354
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Summary affirmance may also be in order when the arguments in the opening brief are incomprehensible or completely insubstantial.”
- “Summary affirmance may also be in order when the arguments in the opening brief are incomprehensible or completely insubstantial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.