United States v. Danny Bill Sander, A/K/A Danny Sander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding sufficient “an on-going business” that had engaged in interstate commerce in the past, and that “it is realistic to assume . . . would continue to conduct business on an interstate basis” in the future
• Development company’s dealings in interstate commerce provided requisite “effect” on same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).