Skip to main content
· 12/13/1994

United States v. Daniel William Halls

Citations

  • 40 F.3d 275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying inevitable discovery doctrine because the evidence showed that an alternative line of investigation existed prior to the misconduct
  • merely avoiding eye contact with state troopers while driving a vehicle fails to give rise to a reasonable inference of illegal activity
  • merely avoiding eye contact with state troopers while driving a vehicle fails to give rise to a reasonable inference of illegal activity
  • merely avoiding eye contact with state troopers while driving a vehicle fails to give rise to a reasonable inference of illegal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Heaney, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.