United States v. Daniel Ware

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rulings admitting expert \nexus\ testimony are reversed only if \manifestly erroneous\
• finding no error where ATF agent also testified that he “previously contacted the manufacturer by mail and telephone”
• finding no error where ATF agent also testified that he \previously contacted the manufacturer by mail and telephone\
• exigent circumstances permitted officer to search car for gun because it was either in car or had been discarded by defendant, and as such, might fall into untrained or malicious hands
• exigent circumstances existed permitting warrantless seizure of shotgun from car, where officer knew that attempted armed robbery had recently occurred and that other officer had pursued car to parking lot, whereupon car’s occupants parked and walked away

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).