Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 3/7/2006

United States v. Daniel W. Porter

Citations

  • 439 F.3d 845
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5668
  • 2006 WL 538255

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that sentence 39 months above the guidelines range was reasonable where the guidelines range did not adequately protect the victim, the defendant’s estranged wife
  • stating that unobjected-to facts in the presentence report are deemed admitted
  • affirming an upward variance from a guidelines range of 57 to 71 months’ imprisonment to 120 months’ imprisonment due to pending kidnapping charges related to the offense of conviction
  • “[T]here seems to be no point at which Mr. Porter is willing to stop in his desire to inflict injury and pain on Mrs. Porter.”
  • “The factual predicate for the district court’s consideration of the pending [state] charges is not at issue. [The defendant] did not object to the PSR’s statement of the facts underlying the state charges and they are deemed admitted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Gruender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Daniel W. Porter

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.