United States v. Daniel Vinge

Oral argument

• Argued

  27 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the ultra vires exception applied and distinguishing cases cited 26 by the dissent on the ground that “none of them involved an outside party who claimed that their assets had wrongfully been seized” (emphasis added)
• reversing the dismissal of claims against a court-appointed receiver where fact issues remained whether the receiver acted within the scope of his authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).