United States v. Daniel Torres-Lona

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding without explanation that Justice Kennedy’s concurrence is controlling because it is “narrower”
• postwarning Miranda statement was governed by Elstad, not Seibert, as failure to warn was not deliberate
• postwarning Miranda statement was governed by Elstad, not Seibert, as failure to warn was not deliberate
• \We treat Justice Kennedy's concurrence as controlling since it provided the fifth vote necessary for a majority and since it was decided on narrower grounds than the plurality opinion.\
• “We treat Justice Kennedy’s concurrence as controlling since it provided the fifth vote necessary for a majority and since it was decided on narrower grounds than the plurality opinion.”
• \We treat Justice Kennedy's concurrence as controlling since it provided the fifth vote necessary for a majority and since it was decided on narrower grounds than the plurality opinion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).