Skip to main content
· 4/14/1987

United States v. Daniel R. Zimmerman, A/K/A Bishop Zimmerman, A/K/A the Great Z

Citations

  • 832 F.2d 454
  • 61 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1159
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 17414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a claim of prejudice where proof of multiple conspiracies varied from indictment charging single conspiracy, but evidence showed defendant was a party to each conspiracy
  • a conviction for conspiracy requires proof that the defendant was “aware of the general nature and scope of the conspiracy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Arnold, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.