Skip to main content
· 3/10/1997

United States v. Daniel Perkins, United States of America v. Daniel Perkins

Citations

  • 108 F.3d 512
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 4241
  • 1997 WL 102488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Congress could have rationally concluded that distribution of cocaine base warrants greater penalties because it is a greater menace to society than cocaine powder
  • affirming § 3B1.1 adjustment and rejecting defendant’s contention that \he only had a buyer/seller relationship with his codefendants\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Russell, Wilkinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.