· 10/22/1991
United States v. Daniel Patterson
Citations
- 947 F.2d 635
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding _________ that the district court properly applied 2K2.1(c)(2) enhancement when evidence showed that defendant had a gun under the front seat of his car while he was driving to purchase drugs, even though no drugs were physically present in the car.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Newman, Pratt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.