Skip to main content
· 10/22/1991

United States v. Daniel Patterson

Citations

  • 947 F.2d 635
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 24949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding _________ that the district court properly applied 2K2.1(c)(2) enhancement when evidence showed that defendant had a gun under the front seat of his car while he was driving to purchase drugs, even though no drugs were physically present in the car.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Newman, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.