United States v. Daniel P. Kramer, Daniel P. Kramer v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting requirement that CAT 13 applicant establish that “someone in his particular alleged 14 circumstances is more likely than not to be tortured”
• “A general complaint of unfair treatment is insufficient to establish protected activity under Title VII.”
• “[I]n determining whether the government has fulfilled its obligations under a plea agreement, we look to the agreement’s provisions.”
• Bureau of Prisons properly decided not to award credit for the time served, as it would have contravened the proscription in 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b) against double crediting
• double-counting would contravene § 3585(b)’s proscription

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).