United States v. Daniel Ogden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Ogden presented a complete defense to child pornography charges without introducing the minor victim’s sexually explicit chat logs
• excluding evidence of the victim's chat logs with other men offered by the defendant to show that \one of those men might have originally persuaded the victim to take the explicit pictures\ in a § 2251 case because Rule 412(a)(1
• excluding evidence of the victim’s chat logs with other men offered by the defendant to show that “one of those men might have originally persuaded the victim to take the explicit pictures” in a § 2251 case because Rule 412(a)(1
• “a defendant acts knowingly” when he is aware that a specified result “is practically certain to follow from his conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).