United States v. Daniel Michael Tropiano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a departure may have been available under Section 5K2.0 if the “district court had stated ... an alternative reason, other than recidivism, for reaching the same result”
• stating, “we think it is obvious that a defendant who knowingly possess a stolen car has no legitimate expectation of privacy in the car.”
• “defendant who knowingly possesses a stolen car has no legitimate expectation of privacy in the car”
• \[W]e think it obvious that a defendant who knowingly possesses a stolen car has no legitimate expectation of privacy in the car.\
• ‘We will vacate a sentence and remand for resentencing if the district court fails to follow the procedures for making such a departure.”
• \We will vacate a sentence and remand for resentencing if the district court fails to follow the procedures for making such a departure.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).