United States v. Daniel Mendoza, AKA Daniela Mendoza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the knowledge requirement was 3 satisfied “because [the defendant] dealt with each victim personally”
• upholding a vulnerable victim sentencing enhancement where the defendant knew or should have known about the victims’ language limitations because the defendant knew the victims personally
• finding that the application note for USSG § 3A1.1(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).