United States v. Daniel Luis Delaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he Supreme Court has made clear that the fact of a prior convic- tion need not be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted by the defendant to satisfy the Sixth Amend- ment”
• stating that “[t]he Supreme Court has made clear that the fact of a prior convic- tion need not be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted by the defendant to satisfy the Sixth Amend- ment”
• stating that “[t]he Supreme Court has made clear that the fact of a prior convic- tion need not be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or admitted by the defendant to satisfy the Sixth Amend- ment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).