Tenth Circuit· 1/22/1993

United States v. Daniel Lee Saltzman

Citations

984 F.2d 1087
1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 988
1993 WL 9782

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant who waits passively while the time runs has less claim to dismissal with prejudice than a defendant who demands, but does not receive, prompt attention
holding a seven-month delay insufficient, in itself, to warrant a dismissal with prejudice
holding a seven-month delay insufficient, in itself, to warrant a dismissal with prejudice
stating that a defendant “who waits passively while the time runs has less claim to dismissal with prejudice” than someone who demands but does not receive prompt attention
stating that a defendant “who waits passively while the time runs has less claim to dismissal with prejudice” than someone who demands but does not receive prompt attention
“[T]he defendant has a burden under the [Speedy Trial Act] to show specific prejudice other than that occasioned by the original filing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brorby, McWilliams, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.