United States v. Daniel LaDeau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that decision whether to dismiss indictment for prosecutorial vindictiveness is reversible only if district court abused its discretion
• finding that the government failed to demonstrate that the “evidentiary landscape has materially altered” for substitution of charges
• “[It] is incorrect to suggest that Goodwin categorically bars a district court from finding that the requisite ‘stake’ could arise in the pretrial setting.”
• “[A] motion to reconsider generally is not a vehicle to reargue a case; it may not be used to raise arguments that could have been raised on initial consideration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).