United States v. Daniel Judon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a clear error to admit a document under Rule 803(5) would not require a new trial “because the proof of guilt on this case was so overwhelming that this latter evidentiary error would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).