United States v. Daniel J. Hart Paul G. O'connell, United States of America v. Daniel J. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s challenge to his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine based on alleged inconsistency with acquittal for distribution of cocaine
• \[Defendant's] acquittal on the distribution count does not affect our consideration of the evidence supporting his conviction for conspiracy.\
• sufficient evidence to demonstrate predisposition where defendant readily admitted that he was involved in distributing cocaine and agreed to obtain cocaine for government agent without being pressured to do so
• jury was entitled to believe government informant instead of defendant
• evidence of entrapment must be undisputed
• review for inconsistency is prohibited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).