United States v. Daniel Holland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no prejudice resulted where defendant failed to produce “evidence to show that counsel could have made a difference to his status” to make him eligible for suspension of deportation or voluntary departure
• proving “fundamental unfairness requires a showing that specific errors prejudiced the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).