· 9/13/1982
United States v. Daniel Hamann
Citations
- 688 F.2d 507
- 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 25725
- 11 Fed. R. Serv. 839
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that district court’s additions to language of § 7.06 instruction were not erroneous because remarks did not depart from spirit of Silvern
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pell, Gibson, Eschbach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.