Skip to main content
· 1/16/1985

United States v. Daniel H. George, Jr., United States of America v. William Paris

Citations

  • 752 F.2d 749
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 27851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • delayed disclosure not prejudicial where no specific allegation of prejudice and defendant “declined the opportunity to recall either witness after production”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffin, Bownes, Weigel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.