United States v. Daniel Fry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming as substantively reasonable a within-Guidelines sentence for a child-pornography offender based on the seriousness of the conduct and the need for adequate deterrence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Chad Pyles
  D.C. Circuit· 2017-07-07· cited 18×
• United States v. Aquino-Florenciani
  First Circuit· 2018-06-25· cited 9×
• United States v. Keniel Thomas
  D.C. Circuit· 2021-06-11· cited 9×
• United States v. Michael Mattea
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-07-17· cited 2×
• United States v. Edmond
  District of Columbia· 2021-02-23

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Olano
  Supreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
• Rita v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 7,739×
• Spears v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 508×
• United States v. Dorvee
  Second Circuit· 2010-08-04· cited 357×
• United States v. Henderson
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-04-29· cited 111×
• United States v. Grober
  Third Circuit· 2010-10-26· cited 91×
• In Re Sealed Case
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 72×
• United States v. Stone
  First Circuit· 2009-08-05· cited 55×
• United States v. Locke
  D.C. Circuit· 2011-12-27· cited 29×
• United States v. Russell
  D.C. Circuit· 2010-04-02· cited 25×
• United States v. Joshua Godoy
  D.C. Circuit· 2013-02-05· cited 23×
• United States v. Arsalan Shemirani
  D.C. Circuit· 2015-06-23· cited 17×
• United States v. Dwayne Head
  D.C. Circuit· 2016-03-25· cited 10×
• United States v. Juan Melgar-Hernandez
  D.C. Circuit· 2016-08-09· cited 6×