Skip to main content
· 2/10/2000

United States v. Daniel Duliga

Citations

  • 204 F.3d 97
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1781
  • 2000 WL 144787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning a district court need not “undertake a searching and individualized inquiry” before establishing an estimate necessary to a sentencing calculation, so long as its estimate is “firmly supported by the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenberg, Roth, Rosenn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.