· 2/10/2000
United States v. Daniel Duliga
Citations
- 204 F.3d 97
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1781
- 2000 WL 144787
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning a district court need not “undertake a searching and individualized inquiry” before establishing an estimate necessary to a sentencing calculation, so long as its estimate is “firmly supported by the record”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenberg, Roth, Rosenn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.