· 1/22/1993
United States v. Daniel D. Clark
Citations
- 984 F.2d 319
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 448
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 975
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 930
- 1993 WL 9701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the revocation of both probation and supervised release related to two prior convictions based on a single action by the offending party was permissible and did not implicate double jeopardy
- explaining that “[t]he same actions by a probationer can lead to direct punishment and can also constitute the basis on which his probation for a prior offense is revoked”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tang, Noonan, Nelson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.