United States v. Daniel Bruce Bonallo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a superficially ambiguous indictment cannot be construed as charging an offense whose elements it omits
• affirming banµ fraud conviction where a banµ employee stole funds from customer accounts and deceiving the banµ as to the activity, ultimately harming the banµ when it reimbursed the customers
• “[T]he House Judiciary Committee, in considering the proposed bank fraud statute, expressly endorsed the broad reading courts have given the mail and wire fraud provisions.”
• “Absent specific evidence of tampering, allegations that computer data has been altered goes to its weight, not admissibility.”
• “The question is whether the false representations were capable of influencing the Bank’s actions.”
• the misrepresentation does not have to precede the transfer of money in bank fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).