United States v. Daniel Anderson Burkett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s explicit limitation of the uses of the evidence “properly limited the jury’s consideration of th[e] evidence”
• holding “there is no specific number of years beyond which prior acts are no longer relevant to the issue of intent”
• approving admission of evidence of prior crime committed seven years before offense for which defendant was being tried

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).