United States v. Daniel A. Medeles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction under Section 1344(2) where indictment did not allege violation of Section 1344(1)
• where indictment alleged only violation of former section 1344(a)(2) and court instructed jury only as to that subsection, conviction could not rest on sufficiency of evidence under former section 1344(a)(1)
• check kiting not false representation under section 1344(a)(2)
• check kiting not false representation under section 1344(a)(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).