United States v. Danial Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming when the district court “focused primarily on [the defendant’s] history and characteristics rather than . . . retribution for the offenses”
• “The court here gave a warning and recognized it was subject to change. A court may caution a defendant about consequences of future violations.”
• “A court may caution a defendant about the consequences of future violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).